https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:55179 Wed 24 Apr 2024 09:34:46 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:48774 0.05). The only outcome measure that had an ICC of more than 0.7 was the latency to first fixation (affective pain words ICC=0.73, general threat words ICC=0.72). When compared with pain-free controls, people with acute LBP looked more often at affective pain words relative to neutral control words. This may indicate a form of engagement bias for people with acute LBP. Attentional bias was not consistent across outcome measures or word groups. Further research is needed to investigate the potential role of attentional bias in the development of persistent pain.]]> Wed 05 Apr 2023 14:02:48 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:53395 Thu 23 Nov 2023 13:36:24 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50956 Mon 14 Aug 2023 14:42:55 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:36214 .70 indicates adequate reliability). The ICCs(2, 1) ranged from -.31 to.71. Reliability varied according to the outcome measure and threat word category. Sensory words had a lower mean ICC (.08) than either affective words (.32) or general threat words (.29). A longer exposure time was associated with higher test-retest reliability. All of the outcome measures, except second-run dwell time, demonstrated low measurement error (<6%). Most of the outcome measures reported high internal consistency (α >.93). Recommendations are discussed for improving the reliability of eyetracking tasks in future research.]]> Fri 06 Mar 2020 12:36:45 AEDT ]]>